site

  1. myWWF Sign in
  2. Sign up
  3. Help

WWF: Responsible forest finance can help stop climate change

Posted on 23 October 2009 | en es

Failure by the world’s financial leaders to support responsible forest finance will allow rampant deforestation to continue and contribute to the disastrous effects of climate change.

Buenos Aires, Argentina — Failure by the world’s financial leaders to support responsible forest finance will allow rampant deforestation to continue and contribute to the disastrous effects of climate change.

WWF’s Global Forest & Trade Network (GFTN) and the Finance Alliance for Sustainable Trade (FAST) on Thursday asked global financial institutions to take a leading role in stopping climate change during the XIIIth World Forestry Congress, taking place this week in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

WWF’s GFTN also announced that it will launch Investment Screening Guidelines for Financial Investors in coming months to encourage support for responsible forest finance.

This innovative resource will identify key environmental and social principles and criteria that need to be considered in all investment decisions pertaining to the forest sector, such as timber, pulp and paper, and other sectors whose activities impact forests, including palm oil cultivation and mining.

“For WWF, the flipside of encouraging investment in good forestry is discouraging banks from financing unsustainable operation,” said Rodney Taylor, WWF International’s Forest Director.

Taylor also said this tool can help the financial community differentiate between good and bad forestry practices.

In addition, financial leaders must recognize the monetary value of natural standing forests, WWF said.
“Financial institutions must recognize the business opportunities in the responsible forestry sector,” said Noemi Perez, FAST’s Executive Director. “FAST is working together with the GFTN to link like-minded financial institutions with responsible producers, creating investments that are not only sound for business, but also contribute to the conservation of the world’s forests.”

Though investors see a huge potential in a forest carbon market — as recently identified in WWF’s 2009 Forest Carbon Investor Survey — recent studies by the GFTN have identified an wariness by financiers to invest in forestry because they believe it involves too much risk and volatility. Studies also showed that investors thought the forest sector lacks suitable collateral from small- to medium-sized businesses.

As a result, there is limited access to money to finance the efforts of responsible forest producers. For example, 69 per cent of responsible forest producers surveyed felt that it was difficult to secure adequate financing, particularly in South America where companies heavily rely on informal investment sources.

To bridge this divide between the needs of responsible producers and the lack of financial capital for this sector, GFTN and FAST, together with the Forest Stewardship Council and the International Finance Corporation co-hosted a special meeting at the Congress.

Responsible forest finance is the support by financial institutions for sustainable business practices in the forest sector.

Comments

Christian

October 24, 2009 - 09:41

I have read comment after comment from naysayers who claim that REDD hasn't a chance of creating an equitable and effective solution to preserve forests. I would be grateful if they could also address the fact that the current stream of cashflows derived from palm oil, soya, timber extraction etc. is not at all equitable from the standpoint of local communities, and it is certainly not funding conservaton. Those who are worried about host country governance issues and equitable distribution of benefits would do all concerned a great favour if they directed their energies into finding constructive solutions to make REDD's design and implementation more effective, rather than simply saying 'No' to a new mechanism that just might (if we can get it right) slow deforestation, and by default, 'Yes' to the status quo of continuing deforestation.

Sean Whyte

October 23, 2009 - 13:24


Why does WWF continue to promote carbon offsetting when organisations like, no less, Interpol, have put on public record their very serious concern that any such funds will be plundered by the Mafia etc? In Indonesia, there is not a hope in hell of any REDD money reaching the local people; it will all have been siphoned off long before it reaches them, by the government, the Mafia, and large NGO groups like WWF.

WAKE UP WWF

 

 

 

Add your comment

captcha

reload

@import url('http://s3.amazonaws.com/getsatisfaction.com/feedback/feedback.css');