Living Planet Report 2006

LPR 2006 Language Versions
- Informe planeta vivo 2006 [pdf, 2.94 MB]
- Der Zustand unseres Planeten [pdf, 572 KB]
- Rapports Planète Vivante 2006 [pdf, 4.85 MB]
- Relatório Planeta Vivo 2006 [pdf, 4.46 MB]
- Живая Планета 2006 [pdf, 2.81 MB]
- लिविंग प्लैनट रिर्पोट 2006 [pdf, 5.94 MB]
- Ripoti ya Sayari Tunamoishi 2006 [pdf, 1.28 MB]
- 生きている地球レポート - 2006 [pdf, 4.68 MB]
- Living Planet Report 2006 - Full Report [pdf, 4.39 MB]
- Rapporto 2006 Sul Pianeta Vivente [pdf, 2.52 MB]
Living Planet Reports
- Living Planet Report 2006 - Full Report [pdf, 4.39 MB]
- Living Planet Report 2004 - Full Report [pdf, 817 KB]
- Living Planet Report 2002 - Full Report [pdf, 1023 KB]
- Living Planet Report 2000 - Full Report [pdf, 2.05 MB]
- Living Planet Report 1999 - Full Report [doc, 139 KB]
- Living Planet Report 1998 - Full report [pdf, 1.72 MB]
It includes the area required to meet people’s consumption from cropland (food, animal feed, fibre, and oil); grassland and pasture (grazing of animals for meat, hides, wool, and milk); fishing grounds (fish and seafood); and forest (wood, wood fibre, pulp, and fuelwood).
It also estimates the area required to absorb the CO2 released when fossil fuels are burned, less the amount taken up by the oceans.
The footprint of nuclear power, about 4% of the global footprint, is included by estimating the footprint for the equivalent amount of energy from fossil fuels.
The area used for a country’s infrastructure, including hydropower, is included as the built-up land footprint component. A country’s biocapacity is a function of the number and type of biologically productive hectares within its borders, and their average yields.
More intensive management can boost yields, but if additional resources are used this also increases the footprint.
In the map above, each country’s size represents its share of the global Ecological Footprint. The colour of each country indicates the per capita footprint of its citizens.
Countries with ecological deficits use more biocapacity than they control within their own territories. Ecological creditor countries have footprints smaller than their own biocapacity.

