site

  1. myWWF Sign in
  2. Sign up
  3. Help

Soy industry adopts environmental safeguards

Posted on 28 May 2009

Soybeans; Paraná, Brazil

Soybeans; Paraná, Brazil

Download

Cassio Moreira

Campinas, Brazil: Elements of the soy industry have agreed to take a milestone step toward improving their production practices, which have led to widespread deforestation, displacement of small-farmers and indigenous peoples, and loss of natural habitats.

On Thursday, participants in the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS) unanimously agreed to implement a pilot program of voluntary production standards aimed at reducing the negative impacts of soy production on the environment and people, particularly in South America.

Most importantly, the interim standards require producers to take certain measures to protect the environment. Those include prohibitions on the conversion of areas with high conservation value – such as forests and savannahs –reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and eliminating the most hazardous pesticides in soy farming.

“We welcome this decision by RTRS members, but now the hard work begins to test and improve these standards over the next 12 months,” said Cassio Moreira, Coordinator of WWF Brazil’s Agriculture and Environment Program, who also serves on the RTRS board. “Everybody in the soy supply chain needs to jump into this process and make it work, especially the buyers who must show their commitment to support the implementation of these standards.”

The agreement is the result of years of dialogue between WWF, other NGOs, farmers, and the soy industry and was finalized at the group’s fourth annual meeting this week in Brazil. The RTRS currently counts more than 100 members, including major private interests in the soy industry, smallholder farmers, feed mill operators, traders, retailers, financial institutions, and social and environmental organizations.

The program is based on a set of standards – known as Principals and Criteria— to improve soy production. They will be tested among several growers and then revised before the next RTRS meeting in 2010. Members will then take a final vote on long-term standards.

The Principles and Criteria also require producers to:

  • Comply with the law and adopt good business practices.
  • Maintain good working conditions, such as paying workers the prevailing wage.
  • Dialogue with surrounding communities, such as equitably resolving land disputes.
  • Engage in good agricultural practices, such as reducing soil erosion, water use and pollution, and the safe handling and minimizing the use of agrochemicals.
The RTRS now needs to maintain momentum by developing a certification system to verify compliance with the standards and establish methods to trace the soy.

Expanding soy production has been linked to the dramatic loss of natural habitats, especially forests and savannahs, in South America. Soy fields have already replaced much of Brazil's savannahs - the Cerrado – and are threatening the Amazon by pushing cattle ranching into that area. The expansion of soy production also threatens the livelihoods of local communities. Agriculture contributed to the disappearance of most of the Atlantic Forest in southern Brazil and eastern Paraguay in the 1970s and 1980s – a scenario that could be repeated in other regions as the global demand for soy is expected to double by 2050.

Soybeans are used in the production of edible oil, cosmetics, foods, and feed for cattle, pigs, poultry and fish. More recently, soy has been used in the production of biofuels to meet increasing energy needs.

Comments

Tjerk Dalhuisen

September 22, 2009 - 08:04

The RTRS soy can never be responsible: it is GM soy for monocultures. The massive use of pesticides and roundup herbicide poisons the land, the rivers and the people and destroys the fertilitiy of the soil. To support such a destructive form of agriculture is a huge mistake.

stedrayton

June 11, 2009 - 13:55

And here's mine

Fabian

June 11, 2009 - 13:42

this is my comment

Ortwin Costenoble

May 29, 2009 - 18:25

If environment is a basic principle and GMO a precautionary, I would know what to choose. RTRS is not the optimum, but it is much more than before and with the potential that GMO will be dealt with in near future. Plus, I doubt if soy grown on formal rainforest areas is a very large part of the areas used by RTRS participants

Tjerk Dalhuisen

May 28, 2009 - 22:34

WWF is serving Monsanto well. Your support for a responsable label on their GM roundup ready soy is in direct contradiction with your 'precautionary principle' on GMO's. In return you receive a very weak standard. Soy grown on areas that were rainforest until april 2008 will still be 'responsible'. Massive pesticide use will be justified with the Panda logo. Congratulations!
You sure have achieved one thing: you lost a donor. Many more will follow when they find out about your greenwash operation for irresponsible soy. See www.toxicsoy.org

 

 

 

Add your comment

captcha

reload

@import url('http://s3.amazonaws.com/getsatisfaction.com/feedback/feedback.css');