site

  1. myWWF Sign in
  2. Sign up
  3. Help

US government says climate change putting polar bears at risk

Posted on 14 May 2008

A polar bear (Ursus maritimus) and her cub.

Climate change is destroying vital polar bear habitat, putting the species at risk of extinction, the US government said today as it listed the polar bear as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

The government’s decision clearly indicates that climate change impacts are already threatening the survivability of animals and habitats, and illustrates the urgency of preparing for and adapting to a rapidly changing climate.

“WWF commends the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for heeding the unequivocal science that the survival of the polar bear is inextricably tied to its Arctic sea ice habitat, which is melting more rapidly than at any other time in recorded human history,” said Margaret Williams, managing director of WWF’s office in Alaska.

“We must take the necessary measures now to help save the polar bear.  The ESA listing is an important first step, but we must also address the underlying cause of climate change: rapidly rising greenhouse gas emissions.”

A victory, but concerns remain

“Today’s decision is a tremendous victory for one of the world’s most iconic and charismatic animals,” said Carter Roberts, president and CEO of WWF-US.  “The other big winner today is sound science, which has clearly trumped politics, providing polar bears a new lease on life.”

Roberts added, “While we applaud today’s announcement, many concerns remain. The 360-page document comes with numerous caveats which we have yet to fully analyse. Interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne was quite explicit in saying, for example, that continued energy production in Alaska remains a priority.

"WWF strongly disagrees with that position and recently became a plaintiff in the litigation challenging the Chukchi lease-sale—a priority area for WWF and home to one of our nation’s two polar bear populations," he said.


Sea ice melting

Sea ice, which polar bears depend on for hunting seals and other prey, melted to record low levels last summer.  The National Snow Ice and Data Centre announced earlier this month that current measurements and projections indicate that the 2008 melt season may also be “extreme”, possibly shattering the record set in 2007.  Some scientists have predicted that the summer Arctic sea ice could be gone entirely as early as 2013.

The decision comes close on the heels of a new WWF report, Arctic Climate Impact Science – An Update Since ACIA, which found that change is occurring in all arctic systems, impacting on the atmosphere and oceans, sea ice and ice sheets, snow and permafrost, as well as species and populations, food webs, ecosystems and human societies.

Melting of arctic sea ice and the Greenland Ice Sheet was found to be severely accelerated, prompting some scientists to discuss whether both may be close to their “tipping point” (the point where, because of climate change, natural systems may experience sudden, rapid and possibly irreversible change).

At the time of publication, Dr Martin Sommerkorn, one of the report’s authors and Senior Climate Change Adviser at WWF International’s Arctic Programme, said: “The magnitude of the physical and ecological changes in the Arctic creates an unprecedented challenge for governments, the corporate sector, community leaders and conservationists to create the conditions under which arctic natural systems have the best chance to adapt.”

He also stated the importance of urgently addressing the underlying causes of these changes: “We need to reduce global emissions of greenhouse gases to levels that will avoid the continued warming of the Arctic and the anticipated resulting disruption of the global climate system,” he said.

A positive step

Today’s decision, however, represents a positive step toward creating conditions under which polar bears inhabiting arctic ecoregions in the US, at least, can better adapt to the physical and ecological challenges they are facing.

“Based on the best available science, if current sea ice trends continue, two-thirds of the world’s polar bears will be lost by 2050,” said Geoffrey York, coordinator of WWF’s Polar Bear Conservation Program. "The threatened species designation will now provide additional legal protections for the bears, including the conservation of critical habitat and the development of a government-supported recovery plan.”

Citing the well-documented loss of sea ice due to climate change, the FWS recommended in September 2006 that the Interior Department list polar bears as threatened under the ESA. The Interior Department was legally required to issue a formal decision on the ESA listing by January 9, 2008, but failed to do so. On April 28, the US District Court for the Northern District of California ordered the Department to issue a formal decision on the listing by May 15.

Overdue announcement

“Today’s announcement is long overdue,” said Williams.  “The delay in listing has opened the door to accelerated oil and gas exploration in the Arctic. In February, the Minerals Management Service (MMS), which is under the jurisdiction of the Interior Department, auctioned off almost 30 million acres of prime polar bear habitat in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea for oil and gas exploration.”

WWF condemns the US decision in February to open the Chukchi Sea to petroleum development;
arctic marine conditions contribute to an oil spill "response gap" that threatens polar bears by effectively limiting the ability to clean up after an oil spill.

WWF is part of a coalition of Alaska native and conservation organisations that filed suit in the federal district court in Alaska, arguing that MMS did not adequately weigh the impacts of oil and gas activities on indigenous communities and wildlife along Alaska’s North Slope.

“We should be taking every action possible to reduce stresses on polar bears, and we believe that oil and gas activities pose formidable risks to the Arctic sea ice ecosystem and the polar bears that inhabit it,” said York.

 
###

 
Background information

* On April 28, 2008, a US District Court ordered the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to issue a decision by 2:00 pm on May 15 on whether to list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.

* In February 2008, the Minerals Management Service opened nearly 30 million acres of prime polar habitat to oil and gas exploration.

* In January 2008, the US Fish and Wildlife Service announced a delay in listing the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.
    
* In December 2007, NASA scientist Dr H Jay Zwally forecasted a total lack of summer sea ice as early as 2012.
    
* In September 2007, following the news that all records for summer sea ice minimum had been broken, the US Geological Survey released a detailed report concluding that the loss of sea ice will likely lead to  localized extinctions of polar bears, with as much of a two-thirds population decline worldwide.
    
* In June 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change confirmed that warming of the world’s climate systems is “unequivocal” and pointed to human activities, such as the 70 percent increase of global heat trapping gases in the last three decades, as a leading cause of the changes.
   
* On December 26, 2006 the Service released a proposal for the listing. Since then, numerous reports have documented the extensive global change due to rising temperatures.

For more information, contact:

Joe Pouliot, Director of Climate and Policy Communications
joe.pouliot@wwfus.org

Comments

Amalie Finlayson, WWF Arctic Web Manager

June 3, 2008 - 08:13

Dear Lela,


Please note this response from Geoff York, the WWF International Arctic Programme Polar Bear Coordinator:

"In the listing decision, the US acknowledged that polar bear sea ice habitat is disappearing. However, the listing does not directly address climate change, which is recognised by all parties as the greatest threat to the long-term survival of the polar bear and the Arctic as a whole. Furthermore, in its decision the US explicitly denies a causal link between the very sources of anthropogenic climate change (burning of fossil fuels) and impacts to “individual polar bears”.

"Listing the polar bear under the US Endangered Species Act alone will not save the bears from regional extirpations. WWF agrees that the ESA is not the correct tool to address climate change. Only aggressive national and international strategies to deal with both climate warming and energy, including new legislation in both arenas, has any chance of slowing the current rate of change and provide polar bears and other sea ice dependent marine mammals the best chance for long term survival.

"That being said, the listing was still a step in the right direction in that it: recognised science over politics; will require that no federal action jeopardise the survival of the species; that critical habitat is designated and protected; and that a recovery plan is put into place. The ESA is one of the strongest environmental laws in the US and its invocation will provide some additional protection to polar bears in the US and abroad. We must make certain that bears are protected from immediate threats so that the most viable population goes forward into an uncertain future.

"While we applaud the decision to list, certainly concerns remain. The decision comes with obvious caveats which we are carefully analysing. WWF strongly disagrees with the administrative ruling that will allow oil and gas activities to occur in polar bear habitat, such as the Alaskan waters of the Chukchi Sea. Earlier this year, WWF US became a plaintiff in litigation challenging the recent Chukchi Sea lease-sale—a priority area for WWF and home to one of the United States’ two polar bear populations.

"The polar bear and the listing process has also focused international attention on changes in the Arctic and the urgent need for action regarding climate change. That too is a positive step. WWF calls upon the US and all Arctic countries to fully implement available protections and address all factors that threaten the survival of the species. We also clearly call on the US to assume a leadership role in the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions to levels that will avoid the continued warming of the Arctic and the anticipated resulting disruption of the global climate system."

Amalie Finlayson, WWF Arctic Web Manager

June 3, 2008 - 08:10

Dear Rebecca, Praveen and Valerie,

Thank you so much for your contribution and comments!

valerie

June 1, 2008 - 14:49

at long last a positive move in the right direction let us urge all concerned to keep up the momentum in this fight for one of the great creatures on this planet

Rebecca Collins

May 18, 2008 - 13:03

Sorry about the last comment. I thought it was an e-mail. Anyway, I'm a big fan of animals. I love them so much. I think it's true that even though they are on the threatened list they are in trouble. Hopefully we know what will happen next....

praveen panwar

May 18, 2008 - 07:26

hello i am praveen for a indian country person, i have love for wild animals i studies for the wilds animals book for wwf. i rally upset for the wild animals is less than for the counting for the wwf organition. so please help for wild animals is a request for a indian person for every animals lovers.

Rebecca

May 17, 2008 - 23:11

I really think it was a good idea to start this buisness. I would love to help the polar bears and other animals around the world. by the way, those t- shirts are cool. I wish I had one! I have a question. Do you try to save dolphins? If you don't I'd really like if you started because their my favorite animals.

Again thanks for saving the animals from extinction.

-Rebecca

Lela Gary

May 17, 2008 - 21:11

In politics "support, papers or reports" with no action is called posturing. To advocates
it is called a Victory!
Is this ESA a hollow victory or does is have legs when the
Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne said that it would be "wholly inappropriate" to use the listing as leverage to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. He also took steps to allow oil-and-gas exploration to proceed in areas where the bears live. When the culprit of the
possible bear population extinction is climate change, is not going to be dealt with as it was assertively expressed, the
advocates' victory becomes posturing...

 

 

 

Add your comment

captcha

reload

@import url('http://s3.amazonaws.com/getsatisfaction.com/feedback/feedback.css');