site

  1. myWWF Sign in
  2. Sign up
  3. Help

Philippine floods stress the human element in Bangkok climate talks - WWF

Posted on 27 September 2009

Traffic chaos as Manila experiences possibly the heaviest rainfall event in its 483 year history. While difficult to link individually to climate change, extreme rainfall events such as this and in Turkey a fortnight ago are typical of those becoming more frequent and severe as a result of climate change.

Bangkok, Thailand – Extreme rainfall causing disastrous flooding in the Philippines should remind delegates gathering for the United Nations climate talks in Bangkok that their deliberations will influence the lives and livelihoods of millions, WWF said.

Regretting the loss of life in the flooding which has displaced hundreds of thousands, WWF said it was aware that Philippines meteorogists had linked the event to climate change, but cautioned that drawing such links to individual extreme weather events was difficult. 

The science is clear however that more frequent and more severe extreme weather events are already and will be an increasing consequence of climate change. This will include more extreme rainfall events similar to the record rainfall brought by tropical storm Ondoy to the Manila area and to flooding from record rains that devastated Istanbul and other areas of Turkey a fortnight ago.

"Ondoy taught Manila a painful and very expensive lesson," wrote WWF-Phillipines Chief Executive Officer Jose Ma. Lorenzo Tan.  "With climate change, no one is ever exempt. Its impacts are dynamic and non-linear. Coastal zones and flood prone areas along river banks and lake shores will of course get hit. But less vulnerable areas and sectors are affected as well, because the impacts of an extreme weather event spill over into transportation, infrastructure, power, telecommunications, health, food security, water - all leading to internal displacement and marginalization of hundreds, even thousands, of people."

“The Philippine floods should remind politicians and delegates negotiating the climate treaty that they are not just talking about paragraphs, amendments and dollars but about the lives of millions of people and the future of this planet,” said Kim Carstensen, Leader of the WWF Global Climate Initiative.

“After months of haggling, losing time and arguing we have now entered the last phase and have an absolutely last minute chance to rescue the climate deal.”

The UN Climate Summit of heads of state in New York last week has given negotiators a mandate to turn the 170-page draft into an agreeable treaty. This is urgently needed to ensure the survival of vulnerable nations at risk from climate change.

According to WWF in order to prevent failure in Copenhagen and future climate disasters, negotiators in Bangkok should aim at cutting the UN draft texts by 40% by the middle of the conference and by 85% by the end of the two-week talks.

The main tasks are in the hands of rich countries which need to come up with ambitious reduction targets as well as finance commitments which will help developing countries to adapt to climate change

“Delegates are equipped with a clear mandate to edit at record speed and accelerate the drafting process”, said Carstensen. “Maybe big targets and big money will only be agreed in Copenhagen, but that can’t be an excuse for wasting time, at least the crucial groundwork must be laid here. We need clarity on what the key elements are for a Copenhagen climate deal.

WWF is worried about a mismatch between credible leadership in Asia and empty rhetoric in Europe and the United States. While key Asian countries are offering concrete contributions to reach a deal in December, EU and US are emerging as major stumbling blocks.

WWF applauds Japan, China and India for outlining concrete mitigation action and for playing an increasingly constructive role in the negotiations, confirming their determination to become the world’s next economic leaders on the basis of a green economy and low carbon growth.

“Pledges such as Japan’s to reduce emissions 25% from 1990 levels by 2020 and that of Indonesia to keep emission growth 26% to 41% below business as usual projections by 2020 are bringing us closer to the global emission reduction targets we need”, said Carstensen.

Both developed and developing Asia are finding their way to the top in the world league of climate action. Now industrialized countries and in particular the US has to follow Asia’s example, and after missed opportunities in New York and Pittsburgh the talks in Bangkok present the next chance to step up.



Comments

John Strom

October 2, 2009 - 17:41

I see WWF continues to belch out the global warming BS. The fact is that areas of the world are getting warmer and others are getting cooler. It's been happening for a few hundred million years and will most likely continue. EVERYTHING is your life and mine is in a state of change. The ONLY constant IS change. Much of the 'global warming' is behind us and the sun spot activity - or lack thereof - is the cause but leave it to the left wing WWF to try to sell the world on your propaganda. A pox on all of your houses including AlGore and George Soros. :/

MeDanone

September 29, 2009 - 01:27

People are suppose to treat each other nicer with compassion and this extrapolate to the environment. So true about throwing money to people when a crisis hits. The likely hood of the money used for any long-term solution is highly unlikely especially when there are street children as young as 5 is still locked up in Manila prison cells with criminals for being wretched in poverty. We have to agree that most of the time, only when crises hits that people actually sees their errors. Sad reality. Hopefully this year we all will have a piece of mind will real changes in COP15.

Torsten Mandal

September 28, 2009 - 21:05

Climate change and flooding can be fought while improving development at the same time by direct seeding multi-pupose trees accross the slope. It was promoted well in the Philipines (SALT-project) but a pest required a new species was introduced, mainly Calliandra calothyrsus, but it sets few seeds. I've developed and published solutions to this, which even poor farmers can use, to get better results than originally. The trees are good for feed, firewood, green manure, fences etc. and grows very fast.

Ainur

September 28, 2009 - 09:24

Данная статья имеет неформальный, информативный стиль, благодарность Вам!

Asenca

September 28, 2009 - 05:13

It would be great if people are not ignorant to the fact that scientist say natural disaster will get worst due to climate change. The IPCC says that cyclones, flood and other disasters will get stronger and more frequent and this we witnessed in the Pacific region over the last few years. Same is the story in Asia.
I don't think this story lacks taste but hits home the message that survival of countries like ours is at stake and that governments should stop playing dirty politics and realistically try to solve the problem of climate change by having a good legal agreement at the end of this year.

Tony Trainor

September 28, 2009 - 02:32

I am dismayed to read such cynical accusations of opportunism against the WWF for commenting on the effects of climate change that affect every natural process on the planet. It is only through the raising of voices by lobby groups from every environmental sector that members of organisations like WWF are not left with a sense of standing isolated with their finger in the dyke, ignored or shouted down by by reactionaries who believe the solution is to throw money at flood victims.

Minyet

September 27, 2009 - 19:11

Very bad taste. I am all for fighting for climate change but horrible move to exploit a tragedy to get your message across.

Who runs your media department? What do people in the Philippines say about this? To not even acknowledge the human suffering this caused or say that your hearts go out to people involved is totally heartless.

Bad taste to the extreme.

skyride

September 27, 2009 - 18:13

This article is irritating because it exploits tragedy for a political cause. There are no facts cited just the basic assumption that global warming is the cause of increases in natural disasters.
The global policies under consideration are anti poor and will greatly hurt the nation of the Philippines. (the place of my birth).
Instead of wasting time and money on the cult and religion of global warming. It would be better to spend money on helping develop these countries. But that would mean more carbon emissions and that goes against the religion of global warming.

 

 

 

Add your comment

captcha

reload

@import url('http://s3.amazonaws.com/getsatisfaction.com/feedback/feedback.css');